Waxin' & Milkin: A Visual Mixtape
Jan 12

Situationist…get it?

Situationist…get it?
  

Critique of Everyday Life
by Henri Lefebvre

via AK Press

Critique of Everyday Lifeby Henri Lefebvre
via AK Press
  

Psychogeographic Guide of Paris (Discourse on the passions of love: Psychogeographic descents of drifting and localisation of ambient unities)
by Guy Debord
1955

Psychogeographic Guide of Paris (Discourse on the passions of love: Psychogeographic descents of drifting and localisation of ambient unities)by Guy Debord1955
  
Nov 29

I always thought Debord would’ve hated the internet. I wonder what he or Jean Baudrillard would think of—so help me God this is the last time I use the term—”social media” sites like facebook, twitter, tumblr or sites like ffffound or even wikipedia. Isn’t this all spectacle? Aren’t we just communicating through a simulacra of images and condensed descriptions? Things once told in books are now told in articles. Works featured in museums and galleries instead whisk through our thoughts like signs passing by a moving train. Courses taught by professors are suddenly abridged into 140 characters or less. Phone calls and letters reduced to status updates and instant messages. 24 frames a second projected on a screen, now diminished to 480x270 pixel 256-color animated gifs, or compressed jpegs. 180 gram vinyl to 128-bit mp3’s. Obfuscated profile images and avatars, a depiction of our personalities.

Like Debord himself said, “all that was once directly lived has become mere representation.”

Are we not living Plato’s Allegory of the Cave right now? (ie: The Matrix, Cronenberg’s eXistenZ, John Carpenter’s They Live, or pretty much any Phillip K. Dick movie adaptation)

Does this mean science fiction authors were “onto something” or maybe they were “on” “something”?

More importantly, if a tree falls in the woods and no one tweets or blogs about it…did it ever happen?

via nevver / guydebord.com

I always thought Debord would’ve hated the internet. I wonder what he or Jean Baudrillard would think of—so help me God this is the last time I use the term—”social media” sites like facebook, twitter, tumblr or sites like ffffound or even wikipedia. Isn’t this all spectacle? Aren’t we just communicating through a simulacra of images and condensed descriptions? Things once told in books are now told in articles. Works featured in museums and galleries instead whisk through our thoughts like signs passing by a moving train. Courses taught by professors are suddenly abridged into 140 characters or less. Phone calls and letters reduced to status updates and instant messages. 24 frames a second projected on a screen, now diminished to 480x270 pixel 256-color animated gifs, or compressed jpegs. 180 gram vinyl to 128-bit mp3’s. Obfuscated profile images and avatars, a depiction of our personalities.
Like Debord himself said, “all that was once directly lived has become mere representation.”
Are we not living Plato’s Allegory of the Cave right now? (ie: The Matrix, Cronenberg’s eXistenZ, John Carpenter’s They Live, or pretty much any Phillip K. Dick movie adaptation)
Does this mean science fiction authors were “onto something” or maybe they were “on” “something”?
More importantly, if a tree falls in the woods and no one tweets or blogs about it…did it ever happen?
via nevver / guydebord.com
  
Oct 20
  
Sep 17

Guy Debord would be proud…

via the87stickupkidssmokendmirrorselegantslum

Guy Debord would be proud…
via the87stickupkids / smokendmirrors / elegantslum